• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Tej Kohli Foundation

Tej Kohli Foundation

Rebuilding People And Communities

  • About
  • Our History
  • Eye Care
    • Tej Kohli & Ruit Foundation
    • Tej Kohli Applied Research
    • Tej Kohli Cornea Institute
    • Tej Kohli Cornea Program
  • Future Bionics
  • Giving
    • Funda Kohli
    • COVID-19 Response
  • News
  • Blog
  • Contact

Resources

Sightsavers India Kolkata final evaluation 2015

June 12, 2015

It has become imperative over the years for eye health to be among one of the highly prioritized public health problems along with other important health issues globally. As per the estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO), about 285 million people are visually impaired. It clearly states in its Global Action Plan (2014-19) that if refractive error services and cataract treatment are provided on priority basis, about two-thirds of the visually impaired population will recover good sight. More than 90 percent of visually impaired people live in developing countries, where the health sector is constrained by lack of affordable and accessible infrastructure and availability of comprehensive eye health services.

Documents Download

Sightsavers India Kolkata final evaluation 2015

Filed Under: Resources

Mapalo & the Singing Tree story

June 10, 2015

Documents Download

Mapalo & the Singing Tree story

Filed Under: Resources

Increasing Prevalence of Myopia in Europe and the Impact of Education

May 26, 2015

Purpose

To investigate whether myopia is becoming more common across Europe and explore whether increasing education levels, an important environmental risk factor for myopia, might explain any temporal trend.

Design

Meta-analysis of population-based, cross-sectional studies from the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium.

Participants

The E3 Consortium is a collaborative network of epidemiological studies of common eye diseases in adults across Europe. Refractive data were available for 61,946 participants from 15 population-based studies performed between 1990 and 2013; participants had a range of median ages from 44 to 78 years.

Methods

Noncycloplegic refraction, year of birth, and highest educational level achieved were obtained for all participants. Myopia was defined as a mean spherical equivalent ≤−0.75 diopters. A random-effects meta-analysis of age-specific myopia prevalence was performed, with sequential analyses stratified by year of birth and highest level of educational attainment.

Main Outcome Measures

Variation in age-specific myopia prevalence for differing years of birth and educational level.

Conclusions

Myopia is becoming more common in Europe; although education levels have increased and are associated with myopia, higher education seems to be an additive rather than explanatory factor. Increasing levels of myopia carry significant clinical and economic implications, with more people at risk of the sight-threatening complications associated with high myopia.

Authors

Katie M. Williams, MPhil, FRCOphth, Geir Bertelsen, MD, PhD, Phillippa Cumberland, MSc, Christian Wolfram, Virginie J.M. Verhoeven, MD, MSc, Eleftherios Anastasopoulos, MD, Gabriëlle H.S. Buitendijk, MD, MSc, Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire, PhD, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, MD, PhD, Maja Gran Erke, MD, PhD, Ruth Hogg, PhD, René Höhn, MD, Pirro Hysi, MD, PhD, Anthony P. Khawaja, MPhil, FRCOphth, Jean-François Korobelnik, MD, Janina Ried, PhD, Johannes R. Vingerling, MD, PhD, Alain Bron, MD.

Published in

Ophthalmology, the journal of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, May 2015

Access full paper at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161642015002808

Filed Under: Resources

Prevalence of refractive error in Europe

May 26, 2015

Abstract

To estimate the prevalence of refractive error in adults across Europe. Refractive data (mean spherical equivalent) collected between 1990 and 2013 from fifteen population-based cohort and cross-sectional studies of the European Eye Epidemiology (E3) Consortium were combined in a random effects meta-analysis stratified by 5-year age intervals and gender. Participants were excluded if they were identified as having had cataract surgery, retinal detachment, refractive surgery or other factors that might influence refraction. Estimates of refractive error prevalence were obtained including the following classifications: myopia ≤−0.75 diopters (D), high myopia ≤−6D, hyperopia ≥1D and astigmatism ≥1D. Meta-analysis of refractive error was performed for 61,946 individuals from fifteen studies with median age ranging from 44 to 81 and minimal ethnic variation (98 % European ancestry).

The age-standardised prevalences (using the 2010 European Standard Population, limited to those ≥25 and <90 years old) were: myopia 30.6 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 30.4–30.9], high myopia 2.7 % (95 % CI 2.69–2.73), hyperopia 25.2 % (95 % CI 25.0–25.4) and astigmatism 23.9 % (95 % CI 23.7–24.1). Age-specific estimates revealed a high prevalence of myopia in younger participants [47.2 % (CI 41.8–52.5) in 25–29 years-olds].

Refractive error affects just over a half of European adults. The greatest burden of refractive error is due to myopia, with high prevalence rates in young adults. Using the 2010 European population estimates, we estimate there are 227.2 million people with myopia across Europe.

Authors

Katie M. Williams, Virginie J. M. Verhoeven, Phillippa Cumberland, Geir Bertelsen, Christian Wolfram, Gabriëlle H. S. Buitendijk, Albert Hofman, Cornelia M. van Duijn, Johannes R. Vingerling, Robert W. A. M. Kuijpers, René Höhn, Alireza Mirshahi, Anthony P. Khawaja, Robert N. Luben, Maja Gran Erke, Therese von Hanno, Omar Mahroo, Ruth Hogg, Christian Gieger, Audrey Cougnard-Grégoire, Eleftherios Anastasopoulos, Alain Bron, Jean-François Dartigues, Jean-François Korobelnik, Catherine Creuzot-Garcher, Fotis Topouzis, Cécile Delcourt, Jugnoo Rahi, Thomas Meitinger, Astrid Fletcher, Paul J. Foster, Norbert Pfeiffer, Caroline C. W. Klaver, and Christopher J. Hammond.

Published in

European Journal of Epidemiology (2015) 30:305–315.

Access full paper at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4385146/

Filed Under: Resources

The Economic Burden of Vision Loss and Eye Disorders in the United States

May 19, 2015

Overview

The impact of chronic health problems is hard to put into words, so Prevent Blindness America put it into numbers by measuring the economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders. At a cost of $139 billion in 2013, eye disorders and vision loss are among the costliest health conditions currently facing the United States.

This report serves to update the prior estimate of the economic burden of eye problems released by Prevent Blindness America in 2007, which found the economic burden of eye problems among Americans aged 40 and older to be approximately $51.4 billion in 2004. While this landmark study has served as the benchmark estimate of the economic burden of eye problems in the United States, continued growth in medical costs, newly available data and methodologies, and a consensus for more comprehensive accounting of all costs for all ages have highlighted the need for an updated estimate of the economic burden of eye disorders and vision loss.

In this report, Prevent Blindness employs more current data and updated methodologies to update and expand the previous estimate. It expands the analysis to include children and adults younger than age 40 by incorporating results from CDC-funded research on the economic burden of vision loss and eye disorders in this population. It captures medical costs for all diseases and conditions related to the eye and ocular adnexa. And it includes costs for out-of-pocket and vision-plan paid expenses, such as routine eye examinations and vision correction.

Available at:

The report is available as an interactive online resource at http://costofvision.preventblindness.org/

Prevent Blindness

Filed Under: Resources

Essential List for Cataract Surgery

May 18, 2015

Documents Download

Essential List for Cataract Surgery

Filed Under: Resources

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 53
  • Page 54
  • Page 55
  • Page 56
  • Page 57
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 73
  • Go to Next Page »
  • Tej Kohli & Ruit Foundation
  • Tej Kohli
  • Contact
  • Our History
  • Eye Care
  • Giving
  • Contact



Copyright © 2026 . Tej Kohli Foundation All Rights Reserved